Any time parents with children divorce, there are specific parts of the divorce decree relating to the children. These include conservatorship (the word we use instead of “custody”), child support, and periods of possession (commonly called “visitation”). The Texas courts have the power to change the parts of a divorce relating to children until the children get out of high school (or earlier, if they are living on their own).
In some situations, the child-related provisions of a decree may be updated and changed. Except in rare cases, the property division contained in a divorce decree is may not be changed. If parents are divorced when children are very young, it is common for child-related provisions of a divorce decree to be changed several times before the children are out of high school.
Modification by Agreement
Frequently, parents who need changes to court orders will make informal modifications to the divorce decree. Although parents are free to make agreements which are in the best interest of a child, agreements for changes which are not included in court orders will not officially change the duties and rights of either parent.
For instance, parents might agree that child support ordered in their divorce decree should be lowered because the paying parent’s income has gone down. If the agreement is not recited in a court order, the paying parent could be required to pay the entire amount as originally ordered by the court if a dispute between the parents arose and could also be held in contempt of court a jailed. This is true even if the parties write down their agreement, unless it is approved by the court.
If the paying party had received a court-approved modification of the divorce decree setting out the reduced amount, he or she would not have been at risk for owing the higher amount unless the court order was changed again. The same risks apply to informal agreements concerning visitation, health insurance payments and any other court orders relating to children.
Most modifications are, however, settled without hearings or trials. The parents’ agreement is written into an Agreed Order Modifying Prior Order in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship. Each party and the attorneys sign the orders and present them to a judge for approval.
If the parents cannot agree, the facts are presented to a judge, associate judge, or, in some cases, a jury, who will decide whether an order should be modified.
In Texas, parents will be named as conservators of children unless there is a good reason why a parent should not be allowed to be a child’s conservator. There are some situations where others, like grandparents, may also be named as children’s conservators.
Generally, parents who divorce will either be named as Joint Managing Conservators, or one parent will be named as Sole Managing Conservator and the other will be named as Possessory Conservator. The Texas Family Code sets out the following as the rights, privileges, duties and powers of Conservators:
- A parent appointed as a conservator of a child has during the period that the parent has possession of the child:
(A) the right to physical possession and to direct the moral and religious training of the child;
(B) the duty of care, control, protection, and reasonable discipline of the child;
(C) the duty to support the child, including providing the child with clothing, food, shelter, and medical and dental care not involving an invasive procedure; and
(D) the power to consent to medical, dental and surgical treatment during an emergency involving an immediate danger to the health and safety of the child.
- Each parent appointed as a conservator of a child has at all times:
(A) the right of access to medical, dental, psychological, and educational records of the child;
(B) the right to consult with any physician, dentist or psychologist of the child;
(C) the right to consult with school officials concerning the child’s welfare and educational status, including school activities;
(D) the right to attend school activities;
(E) the right to be designated on any records as a person to be notified in case of an emergency; and
(F) the right to manage the estate of the child to the extent the estate has been created by the parent or the parent’s family.
- A parent appointed as the Sole Managing Conservator of a child exclusively has:
(A) the right to the services and earnings of the child;
(B) the power to consent to marriage, to enlistment in the armed forces of the United States, to medical, dental, and surgical treatment involving invasive procedures, and to psychiatric and psychological treatment;
(C) the power to represent the child in legal action and to make other decisions of substantial legal significance concerning the child, including the right to establish the primary residence of the child, except when a guardian of the child’s estate or a guardian or attorney ad litem has been appointed for the child, a power as an agent of the child to act in relation to the child’s estate if the child’s action is required by a state, the United States, or a foreign government; and
(D) the power to receive and give receipt for periodic payments for the support of the child and to hold or disburse these funds for the benefit of the child.
A Joint Managing Conservatorship is nothing more than a division of these rights and powers between the parents. Parents can agree to share some of the rights that would otherwise belong only to a Sole Managing Conservator. Naming the parents as Joint Managing Conservators has no effect on visitation rights or on the amount of child support due under the guidelines. However, the parents can agree to do something that is different that what is called for in the statutory guidelines.
The Texas court that granted a divorce retains the power to modify the parts of the decree relating to children until a child is out of high school or living on his own. If, however, the children have lived for at least six months in another county in Texas, the case must be moved to that county upon any party’s request.
If children whose parents divorced in Texas have lived for at least six months in a different state, any suit to change custody will have to be tried in the state in which the children live. The same rule applies to parents who were divorced in another state and whose children have lived in Texas for at least six months. This rule is part of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, which has been adopted by almost every state in the nation, including Texas. Cases dealing with only support and visitation issues may be kept in the original court if one parent continues to live in the place where the divorce was granted, even if the children have moved out of state.
Persons Who May Bring Suits for Modification
Any person who has rights to possess a child under a court order may ask for a modification. This will almost always include both of the child’s parents and no one else. In some limited cases, other people may be allowed to bring a suit to modify a prior order. Examples are listed below.
A grandparent may start a suit asking for Managing Conservatorship of a child only if the grandparent can prove that the order requested is necessary because the child’s present environment presents a serious question concerning the child’s physical health or welfare; or both parents, the surviving parent, or the managing conservator or custodian either filed the petition or consented to the suit.
Unless both parents are deceased, an original suit requesting possessory conservatorship may not be filed by a grandparent or other person. However, the court may grant a grandparent or other person deemed by the court to have had substantial past contact with the child leave to intervene in a pending suit filed by a person authorized to so under the standing provisions of the Texas Family Code.
Persons With Whom the Child has Lived for Six Months
If the conservators under a court order have allowed a child to live with a person who is not a conservator for six months or more, ending not more than 90 days preceding the date of the filing of the petition, the person who has cared for the child may ask a court to modify a prior court order to give him or her Managing Conservatorship. This would include a step-parent in situations where the child’s parent dies.
In each suit to modify a divorce decree the court will require the person who brings the suit (called the “Movant”) to prove certain facts. If the Movant cannot do this, the court will order that the divorce decree not change. Suits asking to change various parts of the decree require a Movant to prove different elements, but all elements must be proved by credible evidence presented through witnesses and documents. Generally, affidavits are not accepted by a court as evidence.
Grounds – Generally
The court may modify an order or portion of a decree that provides for the appointment of a conservatorship of a child if the modification is in the best interest of the child and
- the circumstances of the child, a conservator, or other party affected by the order have materially and substantially changed since the earlier of the date of the order; or
- the date of the signing of a marital settlement agreement or collaborative law settlement agreement on which the order is based or the rendition; or
- the child is at least 12 years of age and has filed with the court, in writing, the name of the conservator who is the child’s preference to have the exclusive right to determine the primary residence of the child; or
- the conservator who has the exclusive right to establish the primary residence of the child has voluntarily relinquished the primary care and possession of the child to another person for at least 6 months.
The same tests are applicable to situations in which less than one year has elapsed since the order sought to be modified, with the extra affidavit required to be filed containing the facts supporting the allegations described above.
Any time a person asks for changes in a decree due to circumstances which have materially and substantially changed since the time of the prior order, the question of whether a change is “material and substantial” is decided on a case-by-case basis. Courts have ruled that anything from the increased costs of older children to a move by a parent and the children across the country are material and substantial changes.
Elements Required for Modifying Specific Provisions
A suit to modify a prior order will require the Movant to prove different elements depending on the part of the divorce decree he or she is trying to change. The elements a Movant will be required to prove in the most frequently-sought modifications are listed below.
Motions to Change Visitation:
A motion to change the terms and conditions of visitation can occur within a Joint Managing Conservatorship or a Sole Managing Conservatorship. To win such a modification, the Movant must prove the following:
- the circumstances of one or both of the parents or the children have materially and substantially changed since the rendition of the prior order; or
- the order or portion of the decree to be modified has become unworkable or inappropriate under existing circumstances.
A change in the terms and conditions of visitation will usually revise the schedule of time a child spends with each parent. In some unusual circumstances, however, such a modification could deal only with non-schedule issues such as requiring a parent’s time with a child to be supervised.
Motions to Change the Relative Rights and Powers of Conservators:
Often, Joint Managing Conservators will discover that a joint right — for instance a right to determine where a child attends school — is unworkable because they cannot agree. That would be the appropriate time for one of the Joint Managing Conservators to ask the court to modify the parents’ rights, privileges, powers and duties. Similarly, if a Possessory Conservator can prove that there is a need for the child to receive psychological treatment and the Managing Conservator refuses to take the child to a therapist, the Possessory Conservator might ask a court to modify a prior order to give him or her the right to make decisions relating to the child’s mental health.
A Conservator who wants a change in the relative rights, privileges, powers and duties of the Conservators must prove that:
- the circumstances of one or both of the parents or the children have materially and substantially changed since the rendition of the prior order; or
- the decree or a portion of the decree to be modified has become unworkable or inappropriate under existing circumstances.
A Joint Managing Conservator who wants to change the relative rights and duties of the parents must also prove that such a change would be in the best interest of the child.
Sometimes a modification of the rights and duties as divided in a Joint Managing Conservatorship can have the same effect as a change in custody. For instance, a Joint Managing Conservatorship can be set up so that one parent maintains the child’s primary residence and has the child with him or her at all times except when the other parent exercises standard visitation rights. If a parent files a suit asking to be given the right to move the child 500 miles away, it means a major change in the lives of the child and the parents, even though no formal request for change of custody has been filed.
Motions to Modify Child Support:
The Movant must only show that the circumstances of one or both of the parents or the child have materially and substantially changed since the prior order to change the amount of child support. Support modifications may not be entered for amounts that were owed prior to the filing of a request for an increase or decrease. A parent who had custody of a child during a period for which he or she owed support may use that fact as a defense against a motion for contempt for nonpayment of child support during that period.
The Texas legislature has enacted guidelines setting out the amounts of child support that should be paid based on the paying parent’s net income from all sources. A new spouse’s income should not be considered in setting child support. Orders that were entered before there were child support guidelines may be modified so that the amount ordered is consistent with the guidelines. The Family Code is clear, that an increase in the needs, standard of living, or lifestyle of the person who receives the support is not a reason to raise the paying parent’s child support obligation. However, the courts will rule that if the paying parent’s lifestyle has improved, the children should benefit from his or her ability to pay more.
A court may set support in an amount that is different than what the guidelines call for based on factors including whether the paying parent is putting a child through college, the expense related to visitation and the income of the receiving parent.
A parent who pays support is also expected to pay the child’s health insurance premium and part of the uncovered medical expenses for the child. Given the rising cost of both health insurance and medical care, issues relating to health insurance — including policy types and minimum coverage requirements — are frequently the subject of motions to modify child support.
The receiving parent may seek to modify a child support order which calls for support to be paid only through a child’s eighteenth birthday or until a child is out of high school, whichever event occurs later. In cases where children become disabled after a child support order has been established, modification may be available to extend support indefinitely.
Testimony of Children
Generally, judges take the position that children should not be asked to testify in custody matters. It is very difficult for a child to sit on a witness stand, look a parent in the eye and say under oath that he wants to live with the other parent. Judges may interview the children privately, however, and are required to talk to a child who is more than 10 years old if any party requests that the child be interviewed. Judges can decide whether to interview children who are under 10.
Children who are at least 12 years old may sign a statement choosing the name of the person who is the child’s preference to have the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child. A child’s testimony about where he wants to live or the fact that a statement of choice has been signed are not binding on a judge. If a parent can convince a judge that pressure to choose has been put on a child or that a child’s choice would not be best for him or her, the child’s choice will not be honored. Generally, however, the choice of a teenager will greatly influence a custody decision.
Procedure for Modifying Prior Orders
Contents of Motion
All suits by parents to change court orders are started by filing a Motion to Modify Prior Order in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship.
Each request for a change in court orders must state that the elements necessary to prove the requested modification (listed above) exist. Motions which seek to change conservatorship within a year of a prior custody order must also contain an affidavit signed by the Movant stating specific facts to support a claim that the child is in danger of physical or emotional harm.
Citation and Service
Each person whose rights are affected by the order to be modified must be served with the Motion. Persons who are served with a motion must file a written answer within about 20 days if they want to participate in the modification proceedings. A court may not make a valid modification order unless all persons involved have been served with citation or have taken part in the suit.
A court can grant a party’s request to make an immediate change in the prior order until a full hearing on the requested modification can be held. In larger counties, hearings on temporary orders are heard by Associate Judges who hear only family law matters. A party to a modification proceeding who disagrees with the ruling of an Associate Judge may request a new trial before a District Judge, called a trial de novo. Parties pursuing trials de novo after an Associate Judge’s ruling are required to follow strict procedural rules to protect that right.
A court will not change Managing Conservatorship of a child during temporary orders unless it finds that the child’s physical or emotional welfare would be in danger if custody were not changed immediately, or unless a child over the age of 12 years has signed a statement choosing one parent as a Managing Conservator. Even in cases where children have filed such statements, if a Movant is unable to prove that the temporary custody change would be in the best interest of the child, the change will not be ordered.
In situations where the children have lived for more than six months in a county other than where the prior order was entered, the original court may enter temporary orders before moving the case to the new county.
Attorneys prepare for final hearings on Motions to Modify Prior Orders in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship in the same way that they prepare for original divorce trials and other law suits. Clients are asked to prepare lists of possible witnesses and written questions to be answered under oath, called interrogatories, may be sent to each party. Documents, photographs, video and audio tapes relating to the matters in question will also be collected by each side. Often, the parties and some experts will be required to give depositions.
In suits to modify prior orders, parents are entitled to a jury only for the choice of managing conservatorship, the choice of the person who is to have the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child, or whether to impose a restriction on the geographical area in which the conservator may designate as the child’s residence is contested. Judges decide requests to change visitation, support or the relative rights of the parents. Even in cases where a parent wants a change of custody, the jury only gets to decide who has the right to establish the primary residence of the child, not the parents’ rights, visitation or support.
Changes to child-related parts of a prior order will be set out in an Order Modifying Prior Order in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship. Parts of the prior order not addressed by the new order will remain in effect.